Protecting Security Personnel Is the First Step

Nigeria has repeatedly shown that bold reforms can take place when leadership is prepared to act. The removal of fuel subsidies and the unification of the Naira exchange rate demonstrated the government’s willingness to confront previously untouchable issues. Security now demands similar resolve, as no nation can build sustainable progress while fear spreads across both urban and rural communities.

Public discourse often focuses on rising insecurity, yet rarely examines the burden borne by security agencies. A police officer deployed without protective equipment enters the battlefield already disadvantaged. Forces lacking fuel or timely vehicle maintenance for patrol operations cannot confront criminals equipped with sophisticated weapons. Further emboldening this gap, armed groups openly showcase their firepower online—highlighting the government’s loss of authority and coordination in the security space.

In 2022, the federal government distributed 10,635 bulletproof vests to police personnel. This was a commendable step, yet many officers still operate without protective kits, helmets, or modern communication devices. Some purchase boots, uniforms, and tactical gear with personal funds, while others contribute money for fuel or vehicle repairs for patrol vans. This responsibility should never fall on the pockets of those already facing grave danger.

Criminal groups have recognized this vulnerability. Many proudly parade weapons on social media, projecting confidence over state security actors. A nation cannot develop if criminals appear braver than the institutions mandated to secure it.

Nigeria is not lacking in security structures—the Police, Civil Defence, the Military, and special tactical units are all operational. What remains missing is a modern framework for synergy that guarantees seamless inter-agency collaboration. Without such coordination, institutions continue to operate in silos, and silos cannot defeat organized violence.

There must also be transparency surrounding “security votes”—funds allocated monthly to state governors and certain local government authorities. Citizens have the right to know how these resources translate into equipment, intelligence, emergency response, and community protection. Accountability in security spending strengthens public trust in government. Truth does not weaken leadership—it empowers it.